
LOVE……the reason to live for someone. To be able to die for someone. To prioritize someone else over oneself and to forget oneself. Love gives joy and satisfaction but if left incomplete it leads to broken hearts and sadness. This sadness sometimes engulfs some so much that they waste their whole lives in the memory of their lover. Hence, we have the stories of Romeo, Majnu, Devdas, etc.
Talking about it, well……..why are all these passionate lover just men? Do we women lack that passion? The capability of forgetting oneself in someone’s love. The ability to dedicate all our lives to someone we love? Yes, we do have Mira who was completely devoted to Krishna……but just one example? Juliet and Laila are also known for their love stories but not for their madness about their lover. Paro loved Devdas immensely but she finally accepted her ‘unhappy’ married life.
Does what happened to Paro, happens to most of the women? Do they finally also succumb to family pressure and accept their ‘unhappy’ marriages, tying desperately to make it work by compromising at every step or forgetting their ‘love’ in their husband and children. As a contrast to men who have more of a liberty to spoil their lives as they wish. To get depressed, drunk, leave their families and all. So can we conclude that women are not given that amount of liberty to forget oneself in love and just dedicate their lives to someone?
However, we see so many women around us who dedicate their lives loving their husbands, children, their families. Giving them so much of one sided love and affection. Asking nothing at all in return. So if a woman can be so selfless in love, why don’t we have recognition of it? Why don’t we have the acknowledgement of a female equivalent of Devdas, Romeo or Majnu? Or does loving your family taken so much for granted that the intensity of love in it is just not recognized?